Can I change my mind . . . ?
By: Barbara Latimer
In 2010, Torry Ann
Hanson put her adopted seven year old son on a plane back to his native Russia
with a note explaining that she was unable to parent the child she described as "violent
with severe psychopathic issues." She alleged he tried to burn down her home
with everyone inside. The international
fallout was swift and extreme leading to a temporary suspension of all Russian
adoptions to the United States. The core question can’t be addressed by a
moratorium on adoptions. Assuming everything Hanson said was true, does that
give her or any adoptive parent the right to return a difficult or sick child because
of unfulfilled expectations?
In the past two
decades, Americans have adopted approximately sixty thousand Russian children.
Many of these children are discovered post adoption to have severe physical and
developmental issues resulting from fetal alcohol syndrome. They have
attachment/bonding issues. They will never be what the adoptive parents imagined,
but then again, birth children aren’t always what we imagined them to be either.
We work with what we have and do our best to support and love them.
Children once adopted
are yours. You cannot return them like shoes that suddenly start to pinch or a
purse that now seems too large for everyday wear. There are no do overs. For Hansen, U.S. court
assessed breach of contract damages amounting to $150,000, and monthly child
support payments of $1,000 to the Russian orphanage are a debilitating reminder
that adoptions are intended to be permanent . . . as should be expected.
Edited by: Maria Brown
What does this lack of nurturing translate to exactly? It’s simple. Children who do not receive nurturing as infants have decidedly lower IQs and severe psychological problems which last a lifetime. Sometimes this is referred to as the “runt” syndrome or “failure to thrive.”
Sources:
edited by: Maria Brown
Edited by: Maria Brown
Sixty Day Right of "Rescission" on
Adoptions
By: Mikki Dixon
Under most conditions I agree that
adoptions are forever, but there should undoubtedly be a “trial” period. In some states birth mothers have sixty
days to change their mind after giving a child up for adoption. So, too, should
adoptive parents have an opportunity to change their minds if they
find the child requires greater care than they
are capable of providing. The reason
being is although adoption agencies have a legal, ethical, and moral
obligation to disclose any and all health issues of the adoptee, full disclosure is not
always what takes place—especially in overseas adoptions.
It is only within the last decade that the pervasive
neglect experienced by infants and children in orphanages in the former Soviet
bloc has come to light. Had it not been
for the Human Rights Watch (HRW) investigations into conditions in these
orphanages, the world may never have known about the rampant neglect, complete
lack of touching, and nurturing withheld from these children.
The National Institute of Health's study of human
development asserted there is a “sensitive period” during which it is
critical for children to receive nurturing and physical touch in order to stave
off a lifetime of mental illness and behavioral problems. That time period is from birth to ten years
old. LiveScience.com contends that in
studies of the human brain, children who are deprived of a consistent and
loving touch have significantly less grey and white matter in addition to
having a 10% smaller hippocampus than children who receive nearly constant
direct contact in nurturing homes.
What does this lack of nurturing translate to exactly? It’s simple. Children who do not receive nurturing as infants have decidedly lower IQs and severe psychological problems which last a lifetime. Sometimes this is referred to as the “runt” syndrome or “failure to thrive.”
It is with this in mind that I
advocate a trial period during which the prospective parents have
an opportunity to see if the adoptee is a good fit or better suited for another family equipped to handle his or her individual difficulties. Perhaps this seems
callous but my rationale is
this: it takes very special people to take care of a special needs child—not everyone
can do it. The trial period would
protect both the parents and the child.
Sources:
http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/russ98d.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18096809
http://www.livescience.com/21778-early-neglect-alters-kids-brains.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maia-szalavitz/how-orphanages-kill-babie_b_549608.html
edited by: Maria Brown
No comments:
Post a Comment